¥ Notes on TPC course
- Course to focus on a few big ideas
and how they provide coherence to a wide body of content
- PLCs to focus on design of
instruction
¥ Course Content
¥ Focus like a laser on variation and
covariation
- Force the issue of interpreting all
settings in terms of them
- Force the issue of interpreting
common symbolizations in terms of them (e.g., what is an equation from a
covariation perspective?)
¥ Relate course content to issues of
their students' learning and to the curricula that they teach
- The kind of learning we envision
students achieving will be alien to the students that the teachers teach, and
they will resist in subtle ways. They likely will be disequilibrated by the
focus on developing meaning, reasoning from meaning, focusing on
metarepresentational and methodological issues. SO ... we need to design the
PLCs so that they support teachers' trying things out and dealing with the
simultaneous transition of their and their students' to these new ways of
thinking.
- Students' thinking about
covariation (or OTHER's thinking about covariation). Point of this? So that
they realize that success in teaching is not simply about their performance,
but is instead about their students' understandings.
¥ Day 1
- Consent forms
10 min
- Circulate sheet for email addresses
¥ Three questions to frame purpose of
course
(30 mins: 15 min writing, 15
min discussing)
Have teachers write responses
to each, then open discussion
- What are your overall goals for
your students?
- What should your instruction look
like to achieve your goals?
- What knowledge do you need to be
able to teach in this way?
¥ Debrief teachers on what they KNOW
about:
10 minutes (50 min)
Group discussion
- Reform efforts
- Instruction in other countries
- Mathematical expectations of
students around the country and in other countries
- Professional practices that differ
from theirs
¥ Opinions of past professional
development experiences
15 minutes (65 min)
Ask them to think of examples
of _____, then write what you think the attributes of that experience made it
______.
Have teachers write these
responses individually
- Ask for attributes of EXCELLENT
professional development
- Ask for attributes of POOR
professional development
- Ask what they think are the
objectives of professional development
¥ PCA Exam
45 minutes (110 min)
Need to be careful how this is
framed. They must not think that they are being EVALUATED. We are getting
baseline information so that we can track growth and so that we can make better
decisions about designing and adapting the course.
Ask them to show their work
(explain why we ask this)
¥ BREAK
15 minutes (125 min)
¥ Discuss items on the PCA
?? min
Items 3, 8, 19, 22, 24 on
version H
¥ Question for class discussion
- What mathematics does this problem
get at?
What must students understand to understand these
problems?
What must students be able to do to solve these
problems?
What are common misconceptions that might obstruct
students' solving these problems?
To what mathematics are these problems connected?
¥ Give teachers Question 15 (H) to
take home with above questions to recapitulate class discussion
¥ Read Teaching Gap
- Hand out assignment sheet