1
00:00:04,141 --> 00:00:05,676
Something we haven't talked about yet

2
00:00:05,676 --> 00:00:07,942
that I think this graph is a good graph

3
00:00:07,942 --> 00:00:10,250
to touch base on this.

4
00:00:10,250 --> 00:00:12,454
Um... Can these graphs

5
00:00:12,454 --> 00:00:14,157
I know we haven't talked about it yet, but

6
00:00:14,157 --> 00:00:15,814
Can these graphs tell

7
00:00:15,814 --> 00:00:17,422
you anything about 

8
00:00:17,422 --> 00:00:18,234
speeds?

9
00:00:21,353 --> 00:00:22,751
Not even specific speeds

10
00:00:22,751 --> 00:00:24,564
but just general

11
00:00:24,564 --> 00:00:26,408
ideas of speed?

12
00:00:26,408 --> 00:00:28,908
Is he walking fast? Is he walking slow?

13
00:00:28,908 --> 00:00:30,954
Can these graphs tell you anything about that?

14
00:00:30,954 --> 00:00:32,860
[Yeah]

15
00:00:32,860 --> 00:00:33,844
How?

16
00:00:33,844 --> 00:00:35,469
Julie I heard you say yes, I think.

17
00:00:37,314 --> 00:00:39,439
Not specific necessarily. I don't want to know how

18
00:00:39,439 --> 00:00:40,747
fast he was necessarily.

19
00:00:40,747 --> 00:00:43,014
but... Wasn't it you who said yes? [No.]

20
00:00:43,014 --> 00:00:45,487
Was is Symone? [yeah]

21
00:00:45,487 --> 00:00:48,039
Um, so not specific speeds necessarily

22
00:00:48,039 --> 00:00:48,853
You're off the hook. 

23
00:00:48,853 --> 00:00:52,299
But what kinds of things can you look at to help you decide a speed?

24
00:00:52,299 --> 00:00:54,908
[You could look at how much distance]

25
00:00:54,908 --> 00:00:57,045
[he covered in a certain amount of time]

26
00:00:57,045 --> 00:00:58,191
Okay.

27
00:00:58,191 --> 00:01:01,284
And let's pretend that he was walking

28
00:01:01,284 --> 00:01:02,722
quote unquote fast.

29
00:01:03,139 --> 00:01:05,394
What would that look like on a graph?

30
00:01:05,394 --> 00:01:08,831
[it would keep on going up]

31
00:01:08,831 --> 00:01:10,722
Well

32
00:01:10,722 --> 00:01:13,176
even if he was walking slow it would keep going up. 

33
00:01:13,176 --> 00:01:14,706
[okay, well...]

34
00:01:19,097 --> 00:01:20,659
I mean, what you said at the beginning

35
00:01:20,659 --> 00:01:23,316
about, you know, walking a certain distance

36
00:01:23,316 --> 00:01:24,597
in a certain amount of time

37
00:01:24,597 --> 00:01:26,472
you're definitely on the right track. 

38
00:01:26,472 --> 00:01:28,582
but he can walk slow or fast

39
00:01:28,582 --> 00:01:30,222
and still cover distance over time. 

40
00:01:32,036 --> 00:01:35,099
So, how would you decipher what's considered fast and what's considered slow?

41
00:01:35,099 --> 00:01:36,379
Do you see my question? [yeah]

42
00:01:45,004 --> 00:01:47,489
[The more it goes across, like on the time]

43
00:01:47,489 --> 00:01:49,599
[part...like] Okay

44
00:01:49,599 --> 00:01:51,129
[The more it goes across like]

45
00:01:52,457 --> 00:01:53,786
[Say he like, covers, like]

46
00:01:55,582 --> 00:01:58,787
[twenty-five feet in like four seconds] Okay

47
00:01:58,787 --> 00:02:00,090
[it would go up to like there]

48
00:02:00,090 --> 00:02:01,896
[Then you could tell that he was walking fast.]

49
00:02:01,896 --> 00:02:05,007
[But if it was at like five feet in four seconds]

50
00:02:05,007 --> 00:02:07,567
[It means that you would tell that he was walking slow.]

51
00:02:07,567 --> 00:02:09,551
Okay. Good.

52
00:02:09,551 --> 00:02:12,288
If he covers twenty-five feet in four seconds.

53
00:02:12,818 --> 00:02:13,818
versus

54
00:02:13,818 --> 00:02:16,020
covering maybe only five feet

55
00:02:16,020 --> 00:02:17,055
in four seconds

56
00:02:17,864 --> 00:02:19,033
Could you get a sense for

57
00:02:19,033 --> 00:02:20,661
if he was walking fast or slow?

58
00:02:21,645 --> 00:02:23,411
Yeah, you betcha. Um...

59
00:02:24,219 --> 00:02:25,496
Ryan, what do you want to add?

60
00:02:25,496 --> 00:02:28,926
[Maybe the line, like how steep it is?]

61
00:02:28,926 --> 00:02:30,957
Okay, so as far as

62
00:02:30,957 --> 00:02:32,801
visually

63
00:02:32,801 --> 00:02:35,223
Would a faster speed be shown,

64
00:02:35,223 --> 00:02:36,407
like how Ryan said, in like 

65
00:02:36,407 --> 00:02:38,848
the steepness of the line?

66
00:02:38,848 --> 00:02:39,275
What do you think? 

67
00:02:39,275 --> 00:02:41,223
Could it be shown visually like that as well?

68
00:02:42,301 --> 00:02:43,348
Yeah, you guys are good. 

69
00:02:43,348 --> 00:02:45,864
So, I don't know. Can you guys eye-ball this?

70
00:02:45,864 --> 00:02:48,145
Where do you thing he was walking the fastest?

71
00:02:51,723 --> 00:02:52,864
[Four to seven]

72
00:02:53,582 --> 00:02:54,814
From four to seven?

73
00:02:54,814 --> 00:02:56,693
So, hang on, let me...

74
00:02:59,582 --> 00:03:01,286
So from four to seven, this one?

75
00:03:01,286 --> 00:03:02,568
This stretch?

76
00:03:03,176 --> 00:03:04,473
Let me color code this. 

77
00:03:05,754 --> 00:03:07,513
Raise your hand if you think that was his 

78
00:03:07,513 --> 00:03:08,818
fastest travel spot.

79
00:03:11,211 --> 00:03:13,207
OK, got a few, got a few. Um.. What else?

80
00:03:13,207 --> 00:03:14,598
Where else might you think 

81
00:03:14,598 --> 00:03:16,520
we was walking even faster than that?

82
00:03:16,520 --> 00:03:17,903
[Six to eight]

83
00:03:19,786 --> 00:03:20,426
Where Gromick?

84
00:03:20,426 --> 00:03:23,318
[Six to eight... or actually six and a half]

85
00:03:23,318 --> 00:03:24,457
Six and a half to eight?

86
00:03:24,457 --> 00:03:25,879
So like from here 

87
00:03:25,879 --> 00:03:27,129
to the end of his journey? [Yeah]

88
00:03:27,129 --> 00:03:29,106
Raise you hand if you think might be his

89
00:03:29,106 --> 00:03:30,770
quickest walking spot.