case 5

1
00:00:00;00 --> 00:00:01;05
What do you notice about
this rate of change

2
00:00:01;06 --> 00:00:04;02
that's different from the
previous three problems

3
00:00:04;03 --> 00:00:06;02
you were asked to do?
Greg?

4
00:00:06;03 --> 00:00:07;00
[There's more than one.]

5
00:00:07;01 --> 00:00:08;09
More than one what?

6
00:00:08;10 --> 00:00:09;03
[Rate of change.]

7
00:00:09;04 --> 00:00:10;14
Okay, there's more than
one. Meaning, it's

8
00:00:10;15 --> 00:00:15;00
not...what were all these?
Constant. It's not

9
00:00:15;01 --> 00:00:17;13
constant, it changes. Yes,
there are more than one

10
00:00:17;14 --> 00:00:20;14
rates of change given,
there's if you count them,

11
00:00:20;15 --> 00:00:26;04
however much. So, in terms
of the graph that it would

12
00:00:26;05 --> 00:00:28;02
create, the function down
here that you were in

13
00:00:28;03 --> 00:00:30;13
charge of drawing, would
you expect it to be linear?

14
00:00:30;14 --> 00:00;35;11
Simon? Why not?

15
00:00:35;12 --> 00:00:38;09
[The rate of change
is getting higher]

16
00:00:38;10 --> 00:00:45;00
Okay, so what is it about
linear functions, what is

17
00:00:45;01 --> 00:00:46;05
it about their
rates of change?

18
00:00:46;06 --> 00:00:49;03
[They're the same
all the time.]

19
00:00:49;04 --> 00:00:50;08
They're the same all the
time. And Greg's already

20
00:00:50;09 --> 00:00:52;10
pointed out that this rate
of change is about the same

21
00:00:52;11 --> 00:00:56;03
the whole time. so,
automatically you should be

22
00:00:56;04 --> 00:00:58;12
thinking to yourself that
this is not linear.

23
00:00:58;13 --> 00:01:01;06
So what will it do?

24
00:01:01;07 --> 00:01:12;02
So, in terms of how to kind
of use this information,

25
00:01:12;03 --> 00:01:14;13
you guys knew how to use
the constant rate of change

26
00:01:14;14 --> 00:01:16;09
because whatever the
constant rate of change was

27
00:01:16;10 --> 00:01:18;14
that was given, you just
used it the whole time. You

28
00:01:18;15 --> 00:01:21;01
didn't even pay attention
really to what you were

29
00:01:21;02 --> 00:01:24;01
looking at because that
constant rate of change was

30
00:01:24;02 --> 00:01:26;08
going to stay through and
through. IN this case,

31
00:01:28;09 --> 00:01:29;07
depending on which values
of x you're looking at,

32
00:01:29;08 --> 00:01:33;10
they're different rates of
changes, right?

33
00:01:33;11 --> 00:01:38;02
Like, Ethan and Greg
pointed out.