mod 1

Day 6 clip 1: How to Talk about Covariation

Prior to day six, Ms. Coombs and Dr. Thompson discussed the need for classroom rules to guide discussions about moving objects. 

Day 6 clip 2: Exploring the Bungee Jumper Video Frame By Frame

In this segment, also from day six, the class continues discussing the video of a bungee jumper.

Day 6 clip 3: Ms. Coombs Discusses Students' Graphs

In this third video clip from day six, Ms. Coombs asks the students to watch a replay of the bungee jumping video while referring to three student-generated graphs of the relationship of changes in time and changes in vertical distance from the ground. 

Day 6 clip 4: How Graphs Show Speed

In this fourth segment from day six, Ms. Coombs asks students to refer to the frame-by-frame version of the bungee jumping video in order to discuss how the student-generated graphs show speed.

Day 6 clip 5: Discussion of Students' Thinking and How It Arose

After discussing Day Six with Dr. Thompson, Ms. Coombs agrees that the students appear to be graphing the path of the jump instead of thinking about co-varying quantities.   

Day 6 - Clip 5
Discussion of Students' Thinking and How It Arose

After discussing Day Six with Dr. Thompson, Ms. Coombs agrees that the students appear to be graphing the path of the jump instead of thinking about co-varying quantities. She and Dr. Thompson refer to this as “shape thinking.” Ms. Coombs conjectures that the earlier problems where steepness did indicate an increase (or decrease) in speed contributed to this problem. However, in their discussion, Ms. Coombs realizes that her language could have also supported this way of reasoning when she talked about speeding up or slowing down in terms of steepness. Dr. Thompson conjectures that more focus on the covariational relationship of the two variables instead of the shape of the graph would have been more productive.

 

-Day 1 -Day 2 -Day 3 -Day 4 -Day 5 -Day 6 -Day 7